The Real Reason for Vaccine Mandates

September 11, 2019

The argument made for denying a public education to children who are unvaccinated or selectively vaccinated is the risk they pose to the immune-compromised who can’t be vaccinated. It’s a heart-warming story motivated out of compassion for those children who are medically fragile.

Or is it?

If we take these pro-mandate advocates at their word, then it would follow that we also cannot allow any child or adult to attend our public schools and day cares who isn’t fully immunized. This means not just being vaccinated, but rather genuinely immunized against infectious diseases.

So, this begs the question(s):

1.  Are immune-compromised children who can’t be vaccinated allowed to attend school and day care?
2.  Is the 10% of the population who are non-responders to artificial immune stimulation allowed to attend schools and day cares?
3.  Is the significant percent of the population whose antibody levels have waned allowed to attend schools, day cares and other public spaces?
4.  Is titre testing being conducted to determine who has adequate antibody levels and therefore safe to attend school and day care?
5.  And, if disease transmission is really what the proponents of vaccine mandates are worried about, then shouldn’t children recently vaccinated with live-virus vaccines also be excluded from schools and public spaces until the viral shedding has ceased?

If vaccine mandate proponents aren’t demanding all of these individuals be excluded from schools, day cares and other public spaces, then one has to wonder whether the transmission of disease and the safety of the school environment really is their primary concern.

 

It’s Not About Medical Risk

I think we all know the answers to these questions.

None of the unvaccinated immune-compromised children are denied access to a public education. None of the non-responders to the artificial stimulation of the immune system via vaccines are denied a public education. None of the significant number of children and adults whose immunity has waned because of the temporary nature of the immunity provided by vaccines are denied a public education.

We know there is no required titre testing to determine who is actually immune to infection and who is not. And there is no acknowledgement given, much less consideration given, to the viral shedding from a recently vaccinated child. The fact is a child can be vaccinated with a live-virus vaccine in the gymnasium and be back in their classroom within minutes.

This means that the restrictions being imposed upon unvaccinated or selectively vaccinated children are not about medical risk. It is not about the transmission of disease. It is not about the safety of the public space.

If it was about medical risk and the transmission of disease, these other unvaccinated and non (artificially) immune children and adults, as well as those recently vaccinated with live-virus vaccines would also be denied a public education and access to public spaces. But that will never happen.

What is obvious, if we dare to think, is that vaccine mandates are not about making the public space safer. Vaccine mandates and school expulsion are punishment for challenging vaccine ideology. Vaccine mandates are a crude and heartless means to coerce families to vaccinate their children by creating hardship and threatening the future of their children.

When you examine the justification given for eroding parental rights, the medical right to informed consent and constitutional rights, it isn’t what they claim it is. It isn’t about medical risk. It isn’t about compassion for the medically fragile. This is the sham of the medical industry. This is the deception of the vaccine lobbyists. This is the lie perpetuated by the mainstream media.

Vaccine mandate lobbyists like NB Education Minister Dominque Cardy purport to be about health and compassion, but it isn’t health he is concerned about. It isn’t compassion for the immune-compromised. It’s all about selling vaccines and preventing parents from saying no to unwanted and potentially unsafe liability-free medical products.

The medical industry is a for-profit corporation that is captured by greed, arrogance, a lack of accountability, and willful ignorance. This is a profession that purports to have compassion for the vulnerable but has no compassion for the vaccine injured or those made medically fragile as a result of vaccination. This is all about selling vaccine products, with or without your consent.

So, when a politician, medical professional or vaccine industry lobbyist tells you that school mandates are necessary to protect the vulnerable, let them know that you see through their fraud and deception. Tell them you see their lack of integrity.

Tell them that if they really had compassion for the vulnerable, they would have compassion for the vaccine injured.

Tell them that ‘the emperor has no clothes’ and you see their naked greed and callous disregard.

Tell them you do not consent to giving away your right to informed consent and medical decision making for your children and never will.

Tell them that your body belongs to you.

Tell them to take their vaccine mandates and go away, because we live in a free country and intend to keep it that way.

~ Ted Kuntz

For more by Ted Kuntz, click here

Pin It
This entry was posted in Ted Kuntz and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

31 Responses to The Real Reason for Vaccine Mandates

  1. Vax-man says:

    Ted, what do I do when my child gets polio?, the essential oils i’m using don’t work for my next child I might use the brand vaccines. What’s your opinion? (Don’t respond if your not Ted)

    • ProfessorTMR says:

      *you’re

      You actually don’t get to decide who is allowed to respond to comments on our site. Ted’s child was never at risk of paralytic polio from the poliovirus as the last indigenous case in Canada was in 1977, long before Ted’s child was born. His son was, however, at risk of severe injury from vaccination, because that actually happened.

  2. Len Tukwilla says:

    Ted, how do you explain the recent measles outbreaks (which led to the mandates) if vaccination isn’t about risk reduction?

    • ProfessorTMR says:

      He didn’t say “vaccination isn’t about risk reduction.” Clearly vaccines ARE about reducing an individual’s risk of contracting a particular acute infection )as in measles) or experiencing the symptoms of said infection (such as tetanus). Of course, that says absolutely nothing about the risks that are INCREASED due to the vaccine (like the increased child death rate in Guinea-Bissau when DTP vaccines were introduced).

      He SAID that the current rush to MANDATES isn’t about reduction of medical risk. The repeal of the religious exemption in New York will do very little to reduce risk of anything for any significant length of time. It MIGHT slightly reduce the risk of someone who does not wish to encountering measles in the next few years, but even that is very unlikely. Models that account for waning immunity make it clear that we are going to be facing large measles outbreaks (on the order of those we had BEFORE the vaccine was introduced) in the future, no matter how many people we vaccinate, or revaccinate for that matter because studies have shown that a third, “booster,” dose of MMR bumps immunity for only a short while.

      This legislation solves exactly zero problems and creates a slew of others, and that’s exactly what it was intended to do. It was intended to punish those who DARE to make medical decisions for themselves.

      • Sue Morgan says:

        Additionally, the measles vaccine is a live virus vaccine, and the vaccinated actually spread and even contract the illness that is meant to be prevented. Also, our vaccines don’t cover strains from overseas, so if a visitor from another country is infected, they can spread that strain. Many of the outbreaks are among the vaccinated, which the media is careful not to point out, so as not to anger their main advertiser.

      • ProfessorTMR says:

        The vaccine is considered effective against all circulating strains. Of course, that presupposes that we have accurate data, and that’s rare. There is also little evidence of vaccine-strain measles starting significant outbreaks. It causes individual cases, generally called a “normal vaccine reaction,” pretty frequently, but it seems to be rare for it to be strong enough to infect others.

      • Len Tukwilla says:

        There’s never been a confirmed case of vaccine-strain measles being transferred person-to-person.

        A third booster of MMR rarely works IF THE SUBJECT DIDN’T RESPOND TO THE FIRST TWO.

        And Ted said vaccination isn’t about medical risk so…where’s Ted?

      • ProfessorTMR says:

        “Brother-to-Sister Transmission of Measles after Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Immunisation”:
        https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(89)91274-9/fulltext?fbclid=IwAR0Bd4eXP8RU7y0goN-3C_jUowEnMlBJ0ISoiwiFavqRpI8AH4jxnwX9tWg

        “Confirmation” is hard to come by when it’s vaccine strain measles. 😉 This article on identification makes that clear:
        “During the measles outbreak in California in 2015, a large number of suspected cases occurred in recent vaccinees (3). Of the 194 measles virus sequences obtained in the United States in 2015, 73 were identified as vaccine sequences (R. J.McNall, unpublished data).”

        According to the medical literature, people who DIDN’T RESPOND TO THE FIRST TWO measles vaccinations should comprise only 1% of the population. That is not what was being tested in the studies to determine whether a third (booster) dose in adulthood would be worthwhile. It “rarely works,” period.

        Ted isn’t a part of TMR. He graciously allowed us to repost his article. It’s up to him whether or not he wishes to participate in further discussion.

      • Len Tukwilla says:

        Vaccine strain measles can cause a rash and fever like wild measles in 1-2% of recipients – that’s why the genotype is routinely determined by RT-PCR.

        I can’t read the Lancet letter to the editor you linked, but I’m pretty certain I’ve seen AVers post it before and no it wasn’t genotyped.

        I’ve also had AVerss link this study https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5729920/
        claiming it shows a third MMR dose isn’t effective, but if you read it there was only 1 subject out of 662 was seronegative at baseline.

      • ProfessorTMR says:

        And that’s exactly how they get away with saying that transmission doesn’t happen: “it wasn’t genotyped.” This was transmission from one sibling to another in the aftermath of vaccination. Which genotype do you THINK it would be?

        I guess you missed the “We did not find compelling data to support a routine third dose of MMR vaccine” in that paper.

      • Len Tukwilla says:

        Genotypes are routinely determined during outbreaks. You can look up the Disneyland outbreak genotype data for instance. No unvaccinated individual has ever had a confirmed case of vaccine strain measles.

        And like I just said, with only 1 of 662 subjects seronegative at baseline it’s hard to justify a 3rd MMR. In older populations with a higher percentage it’s not.

    • redpill says:

      “if vaccination isn’t about risk reduction”

      Actually the more you vaccinate, the more outbreaks there will be. Some studies to ponder on:
      -Whooping Cough: The study, titled: “Acellular Pertussis vaccines protect against disease but fail to prevent infection and transmission in a nonhuman primate model,” used infant baboons to test the hypothesis that “current acellular pertussis vaccines fail to prevent colonization and transmission” of B. Pertussis. (there is no vaccine for Bordetella Pertussis virus) http://www.pnas (dot) org/content/111/2/787
      Lead author Tod Merkel did comment to the New York Times that when exposed to B. Pertussis after recently getting vaccinated, you could be an asymptomatic carrier and infect others, saying:

      “When you’re newly vaccinated, you are an asymptomatic carrier, which is good for you, but not for the population.” According to Tod Merkel of the FDA, it has now become clear that the vaccine does almost nothing to prevent the spread of whooping cough. Although it does seem to prevent about 80 percent of people from showing symptoms of the disease, it does not prevent them from catching it or spreading it.

      The CDC/FDA/HHS/Pharma are aware that the Pertussis vcaccine makes the vaccinated carries and they sent put a letter in 2013:
      *FDA study helps provide an understanding of rising rates of whooping cough and response to vaccination-https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20170111161009/http:/www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm376937.htm* FDA deleted this off their website.

      -Arch Intern Med. 1994 Aug 22;154(16):1815-20.
      Failure to reach the goal of measles elimination. Apparent paradox of measles infections in immunized persons.
      Poland GA1, Jacobson RM.
      Conclusion: The apparent paradox is that as measles immunization rates rise to high levels in a population, measles becomes a disease of immunized persons.
      -Paper: The Re-Emergence of Measles in Developed Countries: Time to Develop the Next-Generation Measles Vaccines?
      “The measles vaccine has failed,” he explained two years ago in a prescient paper, “The re-emergence of measles in developed countries.” In that paper, he warned that due to factors that most haven’t noticed, measles has come back to be a serious public health threat. Poland sees the need for a major rethink, after concluding that the current measles vaccine is unlikely to ever live up to the job expected of it: “outbreaks are occurring even in highly developed countries where vaccine access, public health infrastructure, and health literacy are not significant issues. This is unexpected and a worrisome harbinger — measles outbreaks are occurring where they are least expected,”
      Dr. Gregory Poland is Professor of Medicine and founder and leader of Mayo Clinic’s Vaccine Research Group. Poland is one of the world’s most admired, most advanced thinkers in the field of vaccinology.
      -Journal of Clinical Microbiology, entitled, “Rapid Identification of Measles Virus Vaccine Genotype by Real-Time PCR,”
      During the measles outbreak in California in 2015, a large number of suspected cases occurred in recent vaccinees. Of the 194 measles virus sequences obtained in the United States in 2015, 73 were identified as vaccine sequences (R. J. McNall, unpublished data). That’s 38%.

      -D. Wakefield give a very informative talk on the Measles on the Highwire Youtube channel WAKEFIELD’S WARNING: “MEASLES IS MUTATING” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Idg_jGdzJcA&t=2104s-starting at 39:29. This is another reason why the more the government vaccinates, the more outbreaks there will be.

      One thing I noticed during all the pants on fire MSM coverage back at the beginning of the year is there was no reporting on how many of the infected with measles were vaccinated. NY Health Dept were told not to give any information. I live in Michigan and there were a few cases but several cases were in vaccinated individuals. If that information was made pubic that would be wakeup call which is why health depts won’t release that info.

      • ProfessorTMR says:

        In this particular outbreak, most cases were in non-vaccinated children in New York. The outbreaks were largely confined to Hasidic Jewish communities, where a good percentage do not vaccinate. They also tend to have large families, which meant that the numbers were naturally higher than they are in most years. It was very similar to the outbreak in the Amish community a few years back. My main concern is that public health authorities made it seem that this was a horrible emergency when the people who were actually having measles didn’t see it as a problem. In other words, the raw number of cases has little to do with the rate of complications. When most cases are in children who were deliberately not vaccinated, there tend to be very few complications. When most cases are in adults who were previously vaccinated or in infants (as in most outbreaks), the concerns are greater because those demographics have much higher risks from infection.

    • redpill says:

      Professor:
      “The vaccine is considered effective against all circulating strains.”

      This is something I’ve never understood. How can it be considered effective against all strains when the makeup of each virus is different? How is it that the CDC says the Rubella part of the MMR vaccine can shed but nothing else? For the last 5 years Merck has been in court accused of falsifying data in regards to the efficacy of the Mumps portion of the MMR by it’s own researchers who say they tainted the samples with animal blood. The Measles portion has never been tested if you read the information on the ICAN network, nor has any other vaccine on the childhood schedule been tested for safety-HHS admitted that in a court document. Recently released MMR report on the ICAN blog shows that the MMR was tested against different lots of MMR in a small number of children included in the trials and the short period of time the children were monitored, but there were a shocking percentage of children participating in the study suffering from gastrointestinal illness and upper-respiratory illness after receiving the Measles, Mumps & Rubella shot. In a test group of 102 children, 11 suffered from measles like rashes and 12 others suffered from multiple other rashes that could be diagnosed as measles. So I’m always curious as to why some don’t think that the measles part of the vaccine doesn’t shed or infect the host. If one part of a vaccine doesn’t work how can the other part be effective? It doesn’t make sense. Rubella sheds, Mumps is based on fraudulent research and doesn’t work by the number of outbreaks recently in the vaccinated so how can the Measles portion work when the vaccines are combined? How does one pull that out of the mix and say, yea this part works?

      The circulating measles strain in the Disney put break was genotype B3 and 38% the people infected had either 2 MMR’s or 1. Some of the children had none but the adults were vaccinated and should not have been infected. Since there is only a vaccine for genotye A, it was ineffective against the B3 strain. Dr. Wakefield did an excellent talk on Highwire where he talks about antigen drift to explain why the Measles vaccine isn’t working because it has mutated and the more the Measles vaccine is used the more drifting that will occur. Right now news genotypes or clads as he calls them are being seen and documented. There are now 19 genotypes or clads viruses for measles. There are now basically three (3) Measles strains: 1. Endemic 2. AMS 3. Current Vaccine strains Antigen Drifts -A*, B2, B3, C1, C2, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6, D7, D8, D9, D10, D11, G2, G3, H1, H2. There is only 1 vaccine for all the Genotypes or clads and that is Genotype A. The current genotype that has been circulating for years are B3 and now D’s are showing up.

      The vaccine isn’t working and I think this is why Dr. Gregory Poland wrote this study back in 1994:
      -Arch Intern Med. 1994 Aug 22;154(16):1815-20. Failure to reach the goal of measles elimination. Apparent paradox of measles infections in immunized persons. Poland GA1, Jacobson RM. Conclusion: The apparent paradox is that as measles immunization rates rise to high levels in a population, measles becomes a disease of immunized persons.
      Than followed up with this in 2012:
      Paper: The Re-Emergence of Measles in Developed Countries: Time to Develop the Next-Generation Measles Vaccines?
      The measles vaccine has failed, he explained two years ago in a prescient paper, “The re-emergence of measles in developed countries.” In that paper, he warned that due to factors that most haven’t noticed, measles has come back to be a serious public health threat. Poland sees the need for a major rethink, after concluding that the current measles vaccine is unlikely to ever live up to the job expected of it: “outbreaks are occurring even in highly developed countries where vaccine access, public health infrastructure, and health literacy are not significant issues. This is unexpected and a worrisome harbinger — measles outbreaks are occurring where they are least expected,” he wrote in his 2012 paper, listing the “surprising numbers of cases occurring in persons who previously received one or even two documented doses of measles-containing vaccine.” During the 1989-1991 U.S. outbreaks, 20% to 40% of those affected had received one to two doses. In a 2011 outbreak in Canada, “over 50% of the 98 individuals had received two doses of measles vaccine.”

      Than you have this study that is a combination of vaccine shedding and vaccine failure:
      MEASLES OUTBREAKS IN HIGHLY VACCINATED POPULATIONS:
      -Outbreak of Measles Among Persons With Prior Evidence of Immunity, New York City, 2011. Oxford Journal.
      Of 88 contacts, four secondary cases were confirmed that had either two doses of measles-containing vaccine or a past positive measles IgG antibody. All cases had laboratory confirmation of measles infection, clinical symptoms consistent with measles, and high avidity IgG antibody characteristic of a secondary immune response.” This report of measles transmission from a twice vaccinated individual. The clinical presentation and laboratory data of the index were typical of measles in a naïve individual. Secondary cases had robust anamnestic antibody responses. No tertiary cases occurred despite numerous contacts.

      Anyway, I confused at to why some people still think that the measles vaccine works for all genotypes. Just the fact that it’s clearly showing sign of waning effectiveness because immunized people are being infected is a clear indication that it’s not working, just delaying the inevitable to a time in life where the virus can do more harm.

      Just thoughts.

  3. Aimee Doyle says:

    I know that West Virginia and Mississippi are two states that have only allowed medical exemptions for years. In fact, Mississippi has the highest child vaccination rate in the country.

    I’m curious about how parents in these states cope. Do they protest? Do they homeschool? How do they handle other childhood activities that may require vaxes (like sports or camps or other activities?) Do they lobby their legislators? Are the legislators and government indifferent?

    I worry more and more states are starting to go the way of no non-medical exemptions. I do see resistance, but it doesn’t seem to be effective. I also worry about nationwide mandates (I know there are bills for federal mandates currently in Congress). I worry that the next large target will be unvaccinated, or partially vaccinated adults. Nightmare scenario – want a driver’s license? Let’s see your vaccination record?

  4. nhokkanen says:

    The California Medical Association tweeted this on Sept. 7:
    “Anti-vaccine movement is rooted in misinformation & anti-science paranoia. It’s an anti-government conspiracy theory… the government is working to cover up a big, harmful secret. It’s paranoid thinking.”

    “Anti-vaccine.” “Anti-science.” “Anti-government.” And they throw in “paranoia,” “paranoid” and “conspiracy” to complete their tacky spiel.

    This is not how medical professionals present scientific evidence to consumers. This is nothing more histrionic PR bullying.

  5. Ann says:

    Yes, yes and yes. Well said! Thank you.

  6. Jan bryan says:

    Thank you for your insight

  7. michael says:

    In Oregon it was the doctors, the public health people who testified against vaccine inserts being made available to parents as part of the informed consent process. They do not want informed consent; they want blind obedience to their dogma. Not all doctors are this dangerous, but many are.

    • ProfessorTMR says:

      I think a lot of doctors are just as duped as cult members. That doesn’t mean that they can’t do a LOT of damage, especially those that consider themselves advocates for “public health.” If it were really about “health,” they would realize that our current public health policies aren’t exactly resulting in a healthy populace and begin looking for REAL answers.

    • redpill says:

      Informed consent is a Federal Law:
      *38 U.S. Code § 7331. Informed consent*
      The Secretary, upon the recommendation of the Under Secretary for Health and pursuant to the provisions of section 7334 of this title, shall prescribe regulations establishing procedures to ensure that all medical and prosthetic research carried out and, to the maximum extent practicable, all patient care furnished under this title shall be carried out only with the full and informed consent of the patient or subject or, in appropriate cases, a representative thereof.

      The Nuremberg Code also is violated when doctors doesn’t follow the law:
      1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. *
      This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
      The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
      (This is self-explanatory. CONSENT and Informed Consent on top of that)
      4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
      5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
      *(I like the fact that the code states that physicians should also serve as test subjects)*
      9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

      “The Nuremberg Code is the most important document in the history of the ethics of medical research.” Evelyne Shuster, Ph.D. New England Journal of Medicine.

      Vaccine mandates also seem to be in violation of individual Civil Rights.

  8. Sue Morgan says:

    The other real reason is to eliminate the healthy control group that negates the lie that vaccines are safe and necessary.

  9. Pasquariello SUSAN says:

    Thank you for having the continued Courage to speak the TRUTH – deeply appreciated …

  10. Tracy Talbott says:

    WOW! SPOT ON! BRAVO!

  11. Erica says:

    Exactly! Well said!

    Additionally, in CA – one mom of a vaccine injured child called 882 doctors and 882 said they would not treat or accept into their practice an unvaccinated child. So… who exactly are the “immune-compromised unvaccinated” that need to be protected there?! And who is treating them?!

    The majority of the immune-compromised are the vaccine injured for whom they have zero compassion.

    • ProfessorTMR says:

      That post was chilling. The situation was like that in New York, but we always had the religious exemption as a (difficult) backup until this year.

    • redpill says:

      When a Doctor kicks a child out of their practice or refuses to care for a child, that child’s case is messing with their money. Look at this booklet from BC/BS in Michigan:
      ®PROVIDER INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR:• BCN Commercial HMO• BCN AdvantageSM HMO-POS• BCBSM Medicare Plus BlueSM PPO2016 Performance Recognition Program
      http://www.whale.to/c/2016-BCN-BCBSM-Incentive-Program-Booklet.pdf
      Look at page 16.
      Payout: COMM $400 per Combo 10 completed for each eligible member
      In Michigan doctors who are part of this incentive program get a bonus of $400 for each child that reaches BC/BS goal. I would bet similar programs are offered in each state.
      When BC/BS found put this was being passed around by Vaccine Rights Advocates their future online booklets for 2017 & 18 did not have the vaccine incentive programs in them. They have replaced it with incentives for the flu shot which pays out $50. I haven’t added it up but I read on a blog that with this incentive program doctor can earn between $40,000-$80,000 in bonuses per year if they keep their numbers up. Do no harm has been replaced with don’t mess with my money.

    • s.ropp says:

      BEN ZONA!!! they are such jerks. Its unbelievable how uncaring they can be
      towards the injured. So very sad.

  12. Elaine says:

    I love that you apply good old-fashioned COMMON SENSE to your articles. Thank you!

  13. Kathy Anders says:

    Bravo, Ted. Keep speaking this clear, calm, undeniable truth. So well done!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *